Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416934›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Impact of Telemonitoring on Hospitalization and Mortality Among Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Neiloofar Mohmand

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Neiloofar MohmandInternal Medicine, Kabul University of Medical Sciences "Abu Ali Ibn Sina", Kabul, AFG.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition associated with high rates of hospitalization and mortality. Telemonitoring has emerged as a potential strategy to improve patient outcomes; however, its effectiveness remains uncertain. This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing telemonitoring interventions with usual care in patients with HF. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies published between January 2010 and December 2025. The final literature search was performed in January 2026. Eligible studies included RCTs reporting hospitalization and/or mortality outcomes associated with telemonitoring interventions. A total of 12 RCTs were included. Telemonitoring interventions demonstrated substantial heterogeneity and included remote patient monitoring systems, implantable cardiac device-based monitoring, telerehabilitation, and remote-guided therapy optimization. Several studies demonstrated reduced hospitalization compared with usual care; however, most studies reported neutral hospitalization outcomes. Regarding mortality, only a limited number of studies reported benefit, whereas most studies demonstrated no clear difference compared with usual care. Overall, telemonitoring may provide supportive benefit in selected patients with HF, although findings remain heterogeneous and predominantly neutral, particularly regarding mortality outcomes. Further well-designed studies with standardized intervention strategies are needed to better define the patient populations most likely to benefit.

Indexed as

heart failurehospitalizationmortalityremote patient monitoringtelemonitoring

Identifiers

PMID42416934
PMCPMC13338606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.