ArticleCureus2026
Psychological Morbidity Among Doctors and Nurses at an Indian Tertiary Care Hospital During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Healthcare workers (HCWs) faced substantial psychological pressure during the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence from Indian tertiary care settings during the acute phase of the outbreak remains limited. This study examined the prevalence of anxiety, depression, and stress among doctors and nurses at a New Delhi tertiary care hospital during the early pandemic period. Methods An anonymous, cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 100 HCWs (84 doctors, 16 nurses) at Moolchand Hospital, New Delhi. The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) was used to quantify psychological morbidity. Sociodemographic and occupational data, including infection-control training adequacy, trust in personal protective equipment (PPE) supply, and perceived social support, were collected via a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise the cohort and the prevalence of psychological symptoms. Results The cohort comprised 53 (53.0%) male and 47 (47.0%) female participants; the majority (40, 40.0%) were aged 31-40 years. Anxiety was the most prevalent psychological outcome (65, 65.0%), followed by depression (20, 20.0%) and stress (15, 15.0%). Insomnia was the most frequently reported individual symptom (43, 43.0%). Participants commonly reported inadequate infection control training, limited trust in PPE adequacy, and self-imposed isolation from family members to reduce transmission risk. Fear of infecting family members and perceived stigma were recurrent qualitative themes. Conclusions Psychological morbidity, particularly anxiety, was highly prevalent among doctors and nurses at a New Delhi tertiary hospital during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Modifiable factors such as infection control training, PPE provision, and social support emerged as important considerations for institutional response. These findings contribute to the evidence base informing mental health preparedness frameworks for future infectious disease outbreaks, particularly in lower-middle-income country settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.