ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
The special extract ERr 731
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Menopause is associated with neuroendocrine changes and a variety of climacteric symptoms. While hormone replacement therapy (HRT) remains a standard treatment, safety concerns increase global interest in non-hormonal alternatives like ERr 731®, an extract from Objective: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of ERr 731® in reducing menopausal climacteric symptoms during a 12-week randomized controlled (RCT) trial followed by a 52-week open-label observational study (OS). Methods: One hundred and twelve perimenopausal women (aged 45-55 years) with climacteric complaints (Menopausal Rating Scale (MRS) ≥18) participated in this RCT while eighty-nine of these study participants continued in the OS. During the RCT patients received either ERr 731® (4 mg daily) or a placebo. During the OS, all participants received ERr 731® and were assessed every 13 weeks for headache/migraine, dizziness, paresthesia, fluor vaginalis, and general well-being. Descriptive statistics and exploratory t-tests compared symptom severity between day 0 and day 84 as well as day 364. Results: During the RCT, climacteric complaints were significantly reduced in the ERr 731® group compared to placebo. Symptom severity also decreased across all domains from baseline to week 52 of the OS. Headache/migraine and paresthesia improvements were notable. Since all participants received ERr 731® during the OS, no significant differences between the prior ERr 731® and placebo groups were present ( Conclusion: ERr 731® demonstrated sustained symptom relief and improved well-being over 52 weeks, supporting its role as a non-hormonal option for managing climacteric complaints in perimenopausal women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.