ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Life, death, and 280 characters: a hashtag analysis of #AssistedSuicide on X (2015-2025).
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Population aging and the growing prevalence of chronic diseases pose significant challenges to the global healthcare system and highlight the relevance of issues related to the end-of-life stages. Social media is an important platform for discussing and exchanging views on these issues. This study aims to analyse public discourse on the X platform (formerly Twitter) between 2015 and 2025, based on the text content of posts (tweets) containing the hashtag #AssistedSuicide. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 105,130 posts containing #AssistedSuicide, published by 28,314 users on X between 2015 and 2025. Data were retrieved via Fedica (20 February 2025) and processed using Python 3. The study included quantitative content analysis, sentiment analysis, geographic distribution mapping, keyword and hashtag analysis, and assessment of legislative discourse and potential amplification patterns. Results: Most posts (99.1%) were in English. The highest activity was observed in the United Kingdom (39.48%), the United States (29.75%), Canada (13.94%), New Zealand (6.22%), and Australia (3.80%), accounting for 93.19% of all posts. Legislative-related content represented a substantial thematic category (38.7%) and also included issues concerning vulnerable populations. Analysis of frequently occurring words and hashtags shows that the discussion on #AssistedSuicide is multifaceted, polarized, and closely linked to legislative, medical, and social issues. The discourse is characterized by high sensitivity to political events and shifts in tone during periods of legislative activity. Conclusion: This study highlights the value of large-scale social media analysis for understanding public attitudes toward assisted suicide and identifying its ethical, social, and regulatory dimensions. Palliative care remains central to reducing suffering and preserving human dignity. The findings underscore the need for evidence-based policies that ensure protection of vulnerable groups, support healthcare professionals, and promote balanced end-of-life care frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.