ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
A qualitative study exploring access to online hearing loss information and support for adults with hearing loss.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This qualitative study explores the barriers and facilitators experienced by adults with hearing loss in accessing hearing-related information and services. Findings were interpreted using the Theoretical Domains Framework, which will be used to inform the design of a novel consumer-centred website-Hear4Health. Methods: A total of 13 participants (19-78 years) were recruited. Nine consumers with hearing loss participated in the focus groups, four of whom also served as representatives of consumer organisations. 12 of the 13 participants were subsequently interviewed (51.25 ± 20.35 years), including seven consumers, two consumer organisation representatives, and three who fulfilled dual roles. Results: Nine themes emerged from the interviews under seven theoretical domains: knowledge, environmental context and resources, social influence, beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences, social/professional role and identity, and behavioural regulation. Barriers to access included the themes poor awareness of hearing loss, low-quality information, mistrust in the hearing industry, stigma, unrealistic expectations for hearing technologies, and deaf identity. Facilitators identified included peer support and the value of lived experience, informed decision-making, and self-efficacy. Discussion: These findings provide crucial insights for the development of Hear4Health. Grounded in the Theoretical Domains Framework, this research underscores the importance of addressing both individual and systemic factors to improve digital access to hearing healthcare and empower adults with hearing loss to make confident and informed choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.