Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416771›Full record

ArticleMaedica2026

Redefining Sciatic Nerve Division Patterns: Cadaveric Study Introducing a Novel Index-Based Classification for Enhanced Clinical Precision.

Vandana Tiwari, Priti Chaudhary, Navita Aggarwal, Apurba Patra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maedica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vandana TiwariAssociate Professor, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Priti ChaudharyProfessor, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Navita AggarwalAdditional Professor, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Apurba PatraAssociated Professor, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Increasing anatomical studies reveal considerable variability in sciatic nerve (SN) division, posing challenges in orthopaedic, neurosurgical and anaesthetic procedures. To address limitations in current classification models, this study introduces a novel sciatic nerve division index (SNDI) for precise sub-classification of SN bifurcation levels. Methods: Fifty-eight lower limbs from 29 formalin-fixed adult cadavers were dissected to trace SN bifurcation beyond the lower border of piriformis (Beaton and Anson Type A). These were further subtyped as Type AI (proximal), AII (mid-thigh) and AIII (distal) based on the vertical bifurcation level using SNDI-a reproducible morphometric tool. Results: Among the 58 limbs, 42 (72.41%) showed extra-pelvic (Type A) bifurcation. Of these, mid-thigh (Type AII) was most common (44.8%), followed by proximal (Type AI) in 29.3% and distal (Type AIII) in 25.9%. Non-Type A variants constituted 27.58%. Although more variations were seen in males, differences between male and female and left and right sides of the same cadaver were statistically insignificant. Conclusion: This study underscores the high variability in SN division and the inadequacy of conventional models. The SNDI system improved consistency and anatomical localization of extra pelvic bifurcation of SN, improving procedural safety and guiding future research and education.

Indexed as

anatomical variationclassificationcommon peroneal nervepiriformis syndrometibial nerve

Identifiers

PMID42416771
PMCPMC13325751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.