ReviewMaedica2026
Nose- and Sinus-related Neuralgia Syndromes: a Narrative Review with Proposed Diagnostic and Management Algorithm.
Review in Maedica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Nose- and sinus-related neuralgia syndromes (NSNS) constitute a constellation of clinical entities characterized by persistent pain in the distribution of nerves from the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Various characterizations and management approaches have been reported in the literature, yet no universally accepted definition exists. The aim of this study is to provide a narrative synthesis of relevant studies and to propose a structured algorithm for the diagnosis and management of this intriguing clinical entity. Materials and methods: A narrative review informed by a structured database search was conducted using Medline (via PubMed), Scopus and manual searching, with no restrictions on publication date. Results: Since Sluder's first description in 1908, a number of related syndromes have been reported in the literature, each with partially overlapping clinical features and diagnostic criteria, including anterior ethmoidal nerve syndrome, anterior ethmoidal neuralgia, sphenopalatine neuralgia, syndrome of the olfactory fissure, nasociliary neuralgia (Charlin's syndrome), collectively reflecting the complex and ambiguous nature of these disorders. While the anterior ethmoidal nerve is central to the syndrome, other nerves innervating the lateral nasal wall and nasal pyramid skin are also implicated in the associated headache. Complex pathophysiological mechanisms contribute to the chronic pain. Clinically, the syndrome is characterized by the absence of a specific sinonasal disease; pain may vary in localization, be uni- or bilateral, and can be associated with mucosal engorgement, intranasal contact points, or a history of facial trauma. A thorough history, clinical examination, nasal endoscopy, imaging of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, recognition of the frequent association with endonasal contact points and the topical anesthetic test remain fundamental to the diagnosis of NSNS. Management options include conservative and surgical approaches. Conclusion: The existing literature on NSNS consists exclusively of small, uncontrolled case series and expert opinion spanning over a century, with no randomized controlled trials or prospective comparative studies, reflecting a persistent evidence gap that limits definitive conclusions about diagnosis and treatment. In this review, a practice-oriented diagnostic and management algorithm is proposed. Prospective controlled studies are needed to validate and refine these recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.