ReviewMaedica2026
The Impact of Interleukin-6 on the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease and the Prognosis of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Review in Maedica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) represent a significant public health problem which is affecting an increasingly younger population. The management of these conditions becomes increasingly difficult, considering that their long-term evolution is accompanied by multiple complications. In this context, numerous studies have been conducted to identify new prognostic markers whose use can aid in patient stratification and understanding of their progression. Given its role in the atherosclerotic process, interleukin (IL)-6, a pro-inflammatory cytokine with pleiotropic effects in the body, has been the subject of numerous studies and it has been correlated with the severity of coronary artery disease and the prognosis of patients with ACS. It appears to be involved in the extent of myocardial damage, the development of ischemia-reperfusion injury, the onset of heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction and increased cardiovascular mortality. However, studies have not been able to establish a cutoff value at which therapeutic intervention should be intensified to prevent adverse events and further investigation is needed; for this reason, its use in current practice is limited. This biomarker offers multiple applications, ranging from predicting the development of ACS, assessing the complexity of coronary artery disease, and stratifying post-infarction patients. Furthermore, it represents an attractive therapeutic target for reducing cardiovascular events; however, additional studies are needed to determine the degree of inhibition, the timing of initiation and the duration of therapy to avoid interfering with healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.