ReviewImaging science in dentistry2026
Contribution of cone-beam computed tomography to the evaluation of lesions resulting from multiple myeloma and to the early diagnosis of the disease: A scoping review.
Review in Imaging science in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the available evidence regarding the contribution of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to the evaluation of osteolytic lesions resulting from multiple myeloma (MM) and to the early diagnosis of the disease. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, LILACS, Google Scholar, and OpenGrey through November 2025, without restrictions on language or publication date. Studies that identified or described MM-related lesions using CBCT were included, whereas those involving patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws were excluded. Results: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, including 11 case reports, 2 case series, and 4 cross-sectional studies. In most case reports (9 studies), the initial clinical suspicion arose from oral alterations and/or the identification of osteolytic lesions on CBCT, prompting medical referral. The mandible was the most frequently affected site (13 studies). Various tomographic patterns were described, most commonly extensive lesions with irregular contours and ill-defined margins (10 studies) and punched-out lesions (5 studies). Conclusion: CBCT demonstrates potential as a valuable tool for the early identification and characterization of MM-related lesions in the head and neck region. However, the available literature remains limited and is predominantly composed of isolated case reports, indicating a substantial knowledge gap. These findings underscore the need for further research and for the training of dental professionals-particularly radiologists-to adopt a more sensitive and multidisciplinary diagnostic approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.