ReviewImaging science in dentistry2026
Classification of dental implants using supervised deep learning from dental radiographs: A scoping review.
Review in Imaging science in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This scoping review examined the evidence on the use of supervised deep learning models for the classification of dental implants using radiographic images. Materials and Methods: A preliminary search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, PROSPERO, JBI Evidence Synthesis, and the Open Science Framework, identifying a small number of relevant records. A comprehensive search was subsequently performed across 7 databases using adapted strategies without filters. Studies were included if they evaluated implant classification using supervised deep learning models applied to panoramic or periapical radiographs. Studies were excluded if they did not involve implant classification, were review articles, involved children, were unavailable in full text, or did not apply artificial intelligence methods. Data extraction was conducted by 2 independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Results: Of 274 records, 9 studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies published between 2020 and 2024 evaluated deep learning and machine learning approaches for dental implant identification and classification from radiographic images. A range of models was applied, predominantly convolutional neural networks. Dataset sizes ranged from 355 to 156,965 radiographs and included multiple implant brands. Few studies addressed ethical considerations related to recent data protection regulations. Conclusion: This scoping review indicates that most deep learning-based approaches to implant classification using dental radiographs primarily rely on implant brand or manufacturer as the labeling strategy. This reliance may limit model generalizability and long-term applicability due to the frequent discontinuation of implant systems. Future studies should focus on intrinsic radiographic characteristics, including macrogeometry and prosthetic connection types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.