ArticleJCPP advances2026
Ecological momentary assessment of momentary loneliness, body dissatisfaction, and dysregulated eating in adolescents.
Article in JCPP advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: This objective of this study was to use ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to investigate the relationships of momentary loneliness with body dissatisfaction and dysregulated eating in a diverse sample of adolescents as well as trait peer teasing as a moderator of associations. Methods: Seventy-four adolescents aged 13-17 completed a baseline measure of peer teasing and a 10-day EMA protocol, reporting momentary feelings of loneliness, affect, body dissatisfaction, and eating behaviors. Mixed models were used to examine within- and between-subject associations of loneliness with dysregulated eating and body dissatisfaction, including trait peer teasing as a moderator. Results: Models revealed that elevated momentary loneliness was significantly associated with higher concurrent body dissatisfaction (Estimate = 0.13, SE = 0.02, Conclusion: These findings highlight the acute relationship between loneliness and greater body dissatisfaction and emphasize the importance of targeting loneliness and peer teasing in ED prevention and intervention efforts. The effect of acute loneliness on dysregulated eating may be more complex, necessitating future research clarifying this association. Preventions for EDs that focus on increasing meaningful social connection may be useful for reducing body dissatisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.