ArticleJCPP advances2026
Predicting 7-year-olds mental health in the perinatal period: Development and internal validation of a multivariable model using the prospective ALSPAC cohort.
Article in JCPP advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Mental health difficulties in childhood are increasing. Prevention is the only sustainable and ethical public health approach. However, predicting which children are most at-risk of mental health difficulties prior to symptoms emerging remains elusive. Methods: We developed and internally validated a perinatal multivariable model, predicting 7-year-olds mental health, using the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children ( Results: Combining eight variables predicted poor mental health, with a C-statistic of 0.66; 95% Confidence-Interval (0.64-0.68). It accurately predicted 85.6% of the participants mental health at 7-years in the perinatal period. Model performance was similar across groups of interest. Applying this model leads to a higher benefit than serving 'all' or 'no' children, that is, using the model, 30.9% of children who later had poor mental health would have been identified in the perinatal period. Conclusion: It is possible to predict childhood mental health at birth with moderate accuracy. Similar patterns of model performance were observed in this English cohort compared to a previous French cohort. At population-level, the model is most useful for ruling-out babies who are not predicted to be high-risk. In addition to improving its positive predictive value and external validation, future research should examine the model's performance at service-delivery level before implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.