ArticleJCPP advances2026
Language interventions for autistic people: An online survey of community member views and priorities.
Article in JCPP advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Identifying interventions for developing language skills in autistic people is a top research priority. To develop effective language interventions, it is essential to understand whether community members feel they are important, acceptable, and meaningful. The aim of our research was to elicit views from members of the autism community on language and language interventions for autistic people. Methods: Our diverse team (comprising those with lived and professional experience of autism and/or language interventions) achieved our goals using an online survey. Via opportunity sampling, we recruited 356 participants including autistic adults, parents of autistic children, and professionals/researchers working with autistic people. Data were thematically analyzed. Results: Participants recognised the importance of language for self-advocacy, societal participation, interacting with others, and expressing needs, feelings and desires. Language was seen as a potential tool for communication, but one of crucial importance in navigating a world designed for non-autistic people. Responses also strongly emphasised the importance of language interventions being focused on autistic people's individual needs, that benefit them, allow them to be their authentic selves, and prioritise choice and agency. Conclusion: Our research highlights the importance of including community voices in the development of language interventions. Future language interventions should be individualised to a person's needs and wishes, respect autistic people's identity, and support self-advocacy. Subsequent work should ensure that seldom-heard voices are centered in such discussions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.