Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416626›Full record

ArticleJCPP advances2026

Examining early inhibitory control and emotion regulation as predictors of childhood internalizing and externalizing problems: A longitudinal study.

Lilja K Jónsdóttir, Matilda A Frick, Andreas Frick, Emma J Heeman, Karin C Brocki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCPP advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lilja K JónsdóttirDepartment of Psychology Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5893-4058
Matilda A FrickDepartment of Psychology Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1307-4928
Andreas FrickDepartment of Psychology Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2516-9075
Emma J HeemanDepartment of Psychology Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5636-2055
Karin C BrockiDepartment of Psychology Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4310-3224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Identifying predictors and mechanisms in the development of childhood internalizing (INT) and externalizing (EXT) problems is crucial for early intervention. Inhibitory control has been linked to INT and EXT, with emotion regulation (ER) potentially mediating these associations. However, specific pathways between early inhibitory control, ER, and later INT and EXT remain unclear. Additionally, regulation of distinct emotions (anger, fear, sadness, joy) may play a role. Methods: The sample included 94 typically developing children from the EFFECT study, a longitudinal project on the development of self-regulation. At age 4, inhibitory control was measured using the Day/Night Stroop Task. At age 6, general ER, as well as regulation of specific emotions (anger, fear, sadness, and joy), were assessed using the Emotion Questionnaire (parent-report). INT and EXT at ages 9-10 were measured using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (parent-report). Correlational and path analyses were conducted. Results: No longitudinal associations were found between inhibitory control at 4 years and either INT or EXT at ages 9-10, or with ER at age 6. Consequently, we found no evidence of mediation by ER. General ER at 6 years emerged as a predictor of both INT and EXT at 9-10 years. While not statistically significant, effect sizes linking regulation of some specific emotions (anger, fear) with subsequent INT and EXT problems warrant further research. Conclusion: The results reflect the complexity of studying longitudinal effects of early inhibitory control. A modest sample size with attrition, and measurement constraints may have attenuated effects and limited generalizability. Meanwhile, our findings highlight ER as a target for intervention across both INT and EXT.

Indexed as

emotion regulationexternalizing problemsinhibitory controlinternalizing problemsself‐regulation

Identifiers

PMID42416626
PMCPMC13339238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.