ArticleJCPP advances2026
Co-production with young people with developmental language disorder: Developing adapted materials for cognitive behavioral therapy.
Article in JCPP advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Young people with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) are at increased risk of mental health difficulties but often face barriers to accessing traditional talking therapies such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Co-production offers a way to create more accessible interventions by involving those with lived experience as well as practitioners. However, co-producing with young people with DLD remains rare due to high language demands and inaccessible formats. Aim: To explore how experienced-based co-design (EBCD) methodologies could be shaped to include young people with DLD, in the context of adapting a set of psychoeducational videos for depression and anxiety. Methods: The UK-based project team consisted of 4 adolescents with DLD, their parents, and six Educational Mental Health Practitioners and 3 academic researchers. A five-stage process included recruiting team members, identifying therapy adaptations, selecting key psychoeducational concepts, developing scripts and videos, and reflecting on the process. Meetings were adapted to maximize accessibility through simplified language, visual aids, pre-meeting preparation videos, asynchronous tasks, and post-meeting summaries. Results: Ten adapted psychoeducational videos were co-produced. Key adaptations included slowed pacing, simplified vocabulary and concrete examples. Team members reported that the process felt inclusive and flexible, and that the final materials were more meaningful and relevant. Challenges included balancing parental input with young people's voices, managing conflicting feedback, and ensuring tasks were not overly demanding. Researcher reflexivity and flexibility was critical to maintaining engagement. Conclusion: This project demonstrates that, with appropriate adaptation, co-production with young people with DLD and practitioners is both feasible and valuable. The process resulted in more accessible therapeutic materials and offers a starting point for further research involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.