ArticleJCPP advances2026
Investigating the impact of early adversity on perceived support from parents and friends in preadolescence: Do genetic predispositions and timing of exposure matter?
Article in JCPP advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Perceived social support contributes to youth resilience, but perceptions of support differ substantially between youth. Genetic predispositions and early life adversity are potential sources for this variation, but research has yet to test gene-environment interplay comprehensively. We examined how early adversity and genetic predispositions for educational attainment, internalizing, and externalizing behaviours uniquely and jointly predict parents and friends support at age 11 and explored associations for different timing of adversity. Methods: Participants were drawn from TRAILS, a longitudinal study of Dutch adolescents. Adversity was measured during the perinatal period (pregnancy to 1-month postdelivery) and childhood (ages 0-11) through Preventive Child Healthcare records and parental interviews at age 11. Participants' genotype data were used to derive polygenic scores. Perceived social support from mothers ( Results: Genetic predispositions for internalizing and externalizing problems were associated with higher childhood adversity and were indirectly related to lower perceived social support. Exposure to perinatal adversity was related to higher maternal support during adolescence, while childhood adversity was associated with less paternal support. These associations further varied based on specific subtypes of adversity, but not according to adolescents' genetic predispositions. Conclusion: Adolescents' genetic liabilities to internalizing and externalizing behaviours predicted early adversity, which correlated with parental but not friends' support. These associations were found to vary based on the timing and nature of adversity, underscoring the need for future studies to more consistently account for these factors and to examine their underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.