ArticleJCPP advances2026
Mental health measures among adolescents in 12 low- and middle-income countries: Measurement invariance and cross-sectional analyses of Disrupting Harm survey data.
Article in JCPP advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nationally representative mental health data in adolescents from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are scarce. This study aimed to examine mental health and wellbeing indicators amongst adolescents in 12 LMICs across Eastern and Southern Africa and Southeast Asia. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data involving 12,169 internet-using adolescents, aged 12-17 years, from Ethiopia, Kenya, Mozambique, Namibia, Tanzania, Uganda, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam. We explored cross-country measurement invariance of the multi-item mental health scales, computed country-level estimates for life satisfaction, psychological wellbeing, anxiety, depression, loneliness, self-harm and suicidal ideation/attempts, and examined socio-demographic variations (across age, gender and food insecurity). Results: Measurement invariance was not established, limiting cross-country comparisons. No consistent patterns of mental health estimates emerged across countries. The greatest variation was observed for loneliness (ranging from 18.3% in Vietnam to 71.3% in the Philippines) and for suicidal ideation/attempts (ranging from 7% in Vietnam to 52.7% in Uganda). Gender and age disparities were present, but their magnitude and direction varied by country. The experience of food insecurity was the most consistent correlate of mental health outcomes, with significant associations with life satisfaction and psychological wellbeing in seven countries each, with anxiety in six, and with depression and loneliness in four. Conclusion: Overall, our findings provide key insights into the validity and use of a range of mental health measures among adolescents across 12 LMICs, as well as valuable within-country observations that may help inform and tailor interventions, policies and future research on adolescent mental health to local contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.