ArticleJCPP advances2026
Posttraumatic stress, perceived hostile intention and reactions to peer provocation: A longitudinal study in US inner-city youth.
Article in JCPP advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies indicated that perceived hostile intention may mediate the link between traumatic experiences and aggressive behaviors, but the longitudinal associations between posttraumatic stress (PTS) and reactions to perceived provocation in adolescents have been underexplored. This study examined the longitudinal impact of PTS on the responses to and attribution of intentionality in peer provocation. Methods: The study was conducted with a representative sample of predominantly ethnic minority youth ( Results: Higher levels of PTS were associated with more frequent choices of physical and verbal aggression, retaliation, teacher mediation, a less frequent choice of ignoring the situation and higher perceived hostile intention behind provocation. Compared to their female counterparts, boys more frequently chose reactions of physical aggression and retaliation, while girls more frequently reported verbal aggression and negotiation strategies. An interaction effect of PTS by gender suggested that compared to girls, boys with higher levels of PTS had more difficulty ignoring perceived peer provocation. Perceived hostile intention fully or partially mediated the association between PTS and physical aggression, verbal aggression, wish for retaliation, not being willing to negotiate, and the lower tendency to ignore provocation. Conclusion: High levels of PTS may significantly influence gender-specific patterns of aggressive responses during conflicts with peers, while perceived hostile intention seems to mediate these associations. These findings may be relevant for the rehabilitation of traumatized youth, and should be taken into account when planning the treatment of adolescents with PTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.