ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Evolution of Energy Sources in Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Current Technology and Future Directions.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia worldwide and is associated with substantial morbidity, increased stroke risk, and a significant healthcare burden. While antiarrhythmic medications and catheter ablation remain central to rhythm control strategies, the efficacy of these therapies declines in persistent and long-standing persistent AF. Surgical ablation has consistently demonstrated superior long-term rhythm control, but this approach remains underutilized due to the associated perceived invasiveness and procedural complexity. Meanwhile, advances in energy sources have transformed the field, with bipolar radiofrequency (RF) and cryoablation established as the gold standard for lesion creation, supported by decades of durable outcomes. Nonetheless, both modalities possess limitations related to thermal injury and technical demands. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA), a non-thermal modality that induces irreversible electroporation (IRE), represents a promising new direction. Indeed, PFA preferentially ablates cardiomyocytes while sparing adjacent structures, enabling rapid, reproducible lesion formation with an improved safety profile. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the ability of this technology to create transmural lesions. Meanwhile, catheter-based studies have shown the associated efficacy and safety with this technology, and early feasibility trials suggest that surgical PFA clamps can replicate most of the Cox-Maze lesion set. Current surgical ablation lesion sets rely primarily on RF or cryoablation. However, emerging modalities such as PFA are poised to enable effective epicardial ablation on the beating heart, a challenge for thermal-based ablation technologies. With the advent of hybrid strategies that combine epicardial surgical ablation with catheter-based endocardial ablation, PFA may broaden the role of surgical ablation in advanced AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.