Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416590›Full record

ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026

Integration of Magnetocardiography and Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With Machine Learning for Detection of Functionally Significant Myocardial Ischemia.

Xincheng Li, Shuangxiang Lin, Linlin Sun, Yanli Yu, Haipeng Liu, Zhen Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xincheng LiThe Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou First People's Hospital, 310000 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0077-6836
Shuangxiang LinDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 310000 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8357-2570
Linlin SunDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University School of Medicine, 310000 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yanli YuDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University School of Medicine, 310000 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2535-2573
Haipeng LiuCentre for Intelligent Healthcare, Coventry University, CV1 5RW Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4212-2503
Zhen WangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University School of Medicine, 310000 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5548-4367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Functional assessment of myocardial ischemia is essential and can be evaluated noninvasively using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and magnetocardiography (MCG). However, the diagnostic value of integrating CCTA and MCG has not been investigated. Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 275 patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent both CCTA and MCG examinations from December 2023 to June 2025. Functionally significant ischemia was defined by invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) or CT-derived FFR (CT-FFR). Quantitative features from both modalities were extracted and normalized. Machine learning (ML) models based on MCG alone, CCTA alone, and combined MCG-CCTA were constructed and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity; model interpretability was examined using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). Results: Of the 275 patients, 98 (35.6%) were classified as being ischemic. The MCG model achieved an AUC of 0.769 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.708-0.829), and the CCTA model yielded an AUC of 0.755 (95% CI: 0.692-0.818). In contrast, the combined MCG-CCTA model developed using ML demonstrated superior performance, with an AUC of 0.829 (95% CI: 0.773-0.885), an accuracy of 0.800, a sensitivity of 0.704, and a specificity of 0.853. Conclusions: A combined MCG-CCTA model developed with ML outperforms models based on either modality alone for detecting functionally significant myocardial ischemia. In clinical practice, this integrated approach may enhance ischemia assessment and inform downstream testing decisions.

Indexed as

computed tomography angiographycoronary artery diseasemachine learningmagnetocardiographymyocardial ischemia

Identifiers

PMID42416590
PMCPMC13339176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.