ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Cardiac Tamponade Under Positive-Pressure Ventilation: Pathophysiological Insights and Implications for Diagnosis.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In mechanically ventilated patients, the clinical and echocardiographic presentation of pericardial tamponade differs from the classic spontaneous-breathing paradigm. Positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) increases pleural and pericardial pressures, narrows the transmural filling gradient, augments ventricular interdependence, and can precipitate tamponade physiology at smaller effusion volumes. Consequently, the classic Doppler cues, such as large respiratory variation in mitral/tricuspid inflow, are commonly blunted, reversed, or absent, and right-sided chamber collapse can be intermittent or phase-shifted across the ventilatory cycle. Therefore, diagnosis depends on integrating clinical suspicion, hemodynamics, and multiple echocardiographic features, including effusion morphology (often loculated/posterior in the postoperative setting), right-atrial systolic and right-ventricular diastolic collapse (timed to the cardiac cycle), venous congestion surrogates (inferior vena cava plethora and superior vena cava/hepatic venous Doppler findings), and direct evidence of reduced stroke volume. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is fast and, when the window is good, can provide a safe guide to life-saving pericardiocentesis. Thus, TTE is established as a first-line approach in both intra-hospital emergencies and in prehospital settings. However, in the context of PPV, tamponade may be underrecognized because suboptimal acoustic windows, postoperative dressings, emphysema, thoracic trauma, or prone positioning can limit TTE. Across 40 physiological, diagnostic accuracy, and impact studies, early TTE after cardiac surgery showed only modest performance in surgically confirmed tamponade (area under the curve of approximately 0.64 and a positive predictive value of approximately 58%). Meanwhile, about half of the postoperative effusions were predominantly posterior or loculated. In mechanically ventilated intensive care unit cohorts, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) resolved almost all prespecified clinical questions and changed therapy more often than TTE (97% vs. 38% and 36% vs. 16%, respectively). These findings support a physiology-anchored approach in which TTE remains first-line; meanwhile, TEE should be considered early when clinical suspicion is moderate-to-high, and TTE is nondiagnostic or when posterior/loculated or regional tamponade is suspected during PPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.