ArticleJournal of inflammation research2026
Clinical Value of Inflammatory Indexes in Predicting Post-Transplantation Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and inflammatory indexes are accessible, non-invasive prognostic biomarkers for HCC patients. This study aims to systematically evaluate the clinical value of various preoperative inflammatory indexes in predicting post-LT outcomes to optimize the stratification of suitable HCC patients that can benefit from LT. Methods: This retrospective study included 239 HCC patients who underwent LT from April 2013 to July 2023 and their inflammatory biomarkers were calculated. Univariate and multivariate analysis were applied to identify independent risk factors for postoperative prognosis. Subgroup analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value in different sub-populations. Prediction models based on preoperative indexes were established using multiple machine-learning model. Mediating effect analysis was utilized to elucidate potential mediating factors. Results: Inflammation biomarkers were significantly different in patients with different postoperative prognosis. Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR, RR: 0.806, 95% CI: 0.675-0.962, P=0.017) served as an independent predictor for early tumor recurrence, with an optimal cutoff of 2.03. The systemic immune-inflammation index served as an independent risk factor for both overall survival (HR: 3.472, 95% CI: 1.322-9.119, P=0.012) and disease-free survival (HR: 2.604, 95% CI: 1.012-6.698, P=0.047), with an optimal cutoff value of 155.19. The prognostic value of SII was robust across nearly all clinical subgroups, while the predictive value of LMR was limited to certain subgroups. The random survival forest model, incorporating alpha-fetoprotein and SII as its most important variables, achieved apparent and bootstrap-corrected C-indexes of 0.814 and 0.754 and apparent and bootstrap-corrected area under receiver characteristic curve of 0.854 and 0.788, demonstrating the optimal predictive accuracy in all established models. Mediating analysis indicated that tumor T stage significantly mediated the correlation between SII and postoperative survival outcomes, while liver function and tumor burden (T stage and tumor number) exerted significantly suppression and mediating effect on correlation between LMR and early tumor recurrence. Conclusion: Preoperative LMR and SII are associated with early tumor recurrence and long-term prognosis in HCC patients after LT. A random survival forest model that integrated these inflammatory indexes with other preoperative variables may serve as a potential complementary tool for early risk stratification in the future after verified by further external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.