Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416545›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cognition2026

A standardized non-linear approach to studying menstrual cycle effects on brain and behavior.

Mateja Perović, Michael L Mack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mateja PerovićDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michael L MackDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Menstrual cycles are major biological events with extensive effects on the brain and cognition, experienced by half of the human population. To develop a comprehensive account of human cognition, it is necessary to successfully integrate and characterize menstrual cycle effects in cognitive science research. However, current approaches to menstrual cycle analysis suffer from low data resolution and are not well-equipped to capture the highly variable, non-linear changes in outcomes of interest across the cycle. We present a validated standardized method remedying these issues, demonstrate its utility using hormonal, behavioral, and neuroimaging data, and provide an open-source toolkit to facilitate its use.

Indexed as

continuous menstrual cyclegeneralized additive model—GAMmenstrual cycle and cognitionmenstrual cycle GAMMstandardized menstrual cycle

Identifiers

PMID42416545
PMCPMC13337944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.