ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
The evolution of the United States nucleic acid screening policies.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In 2002, the chemical synthesis of poliovirus demonstrated the dual-use nature of gene synthesis technologies, and private entities initiated the steps towards preventing their misuse. Over the past several decades, nucleic acid sequence and customer screening practices in the United States have emerged from a progression of reactive steps taken by the federal government and private entities. Methods: This review covers the evolution of nucleic acid synthesis screening guidelines, practices, and potential funding or regulatory requirements in the United States. Results: In the mid-2000s, private entities developed screening software for voluntary use by gene synthesis companies. Policy analyses subsequently recommended the establishment and use of uniform screening guidelines, and gene vendors formed consortia that acquired or developed screening software. Government guidance on this topic was first released in 2010 and was issued as a voluntary "best practice." These were codified by the industry as standards, which were updated in 2017. The government revised and finalized their voluntary guidance in 2023, which was enacted, in Executive Order EO 14110, as funding requirements mandating screening. These were countermanded by Executive Order 14,292 in mid-2025, leaving the path forward for gene synthesis screening uncertain. Discussion: Given statutory and regulatory landscapes outlined herein, we discuss the current and potential future state of nucleic acid screening policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.