Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416534›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

Sequentially coupled musculoskeletal multibody and finite element simulation for biomechanical modeling of the human masticatory system.

Iman Soodmand, Ann-Kristin Becker, Jan-Oliver Sass, Christopher Jabs, Michael Dau, Rainer Bader, Maeruan Kebbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iman Soodmand *Research Laboratory for Biomechanics and Implant Technology, Department of Orthopedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Ann-Kristin Becker *Research Laboratory for Biomechanics and Implant Technology, Department of Orthopedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Jan-Oliver SassResearch Laboratory for Biomechanics and Implant Technology, Department of Orthopedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Christopher JabsResearch Laboratory for Biomechanics and Implant Technology, Department of Orthopedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Michael DauDepartment of Oral, Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Rainer BaderResearch Laboratory for Biomechanics and Implant Technology, Department of Orthopedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Maeruan KebbachResearch Laboratory for Biomechanics and Implant Technology, Department of Orthopedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Finite element (FE) models of the mandible are widely used for biomechanical analysis and preoperative planning in craniomaxillofacial surgery. However, their predictive reliability depends on a realistic representation of geometry, material properties, boundary conditions, and muscular loading, for which no clear consensus currently exists. Therefore, we developed a sequentially coupled computational framework that integrates boundary conditions from a validated inverse-dynamic, scaled-generic musculoskeletal multibody simulation (MMBS) of the human masticatory system under unilateral clenching into a subject-specific, quasi-static FE model of the mandible. Methods: The MMBS model was scaled to a mandibular geometry reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) images. Time-dependent muscle forces and mandibular landmark displacements were transformed from the MMBS to the FE coordinate system and implemented as loading and boundary conditions, respectively. Heterogeneous bone material properties were assigned from CT data. Additionally, a baseline FE model, using common literature assumptions, including static generic muscle forces, fixed boundary conditions, and homogeneous bone material properties, was defined. Starting from this baseline model, sensitivity analyses of the calculated strain and stress distributions in clinically relevant regions of interest were conducted to quantify the influence of bone material properties, applied muscle forces, and the muscle attachment area, thereby isolating the effect of each modeling advancement and demonstrating the value of the proposed MMBS-FE framework. Results: The sequentially coupled MMBS-FE framework predicted realistic mandibular biomechanics with the highest von Mises stresses and logarithmic strains occurring in the balancing-side condyle and the working-side molar region. Bone material properties were the dominant source of variation, causing changes of peak stress up to 161% and peak strain up to 723%, followed by more modest effects from applied muscle forces (up to 31%) and a negligible influence of muscle attachment area definition. Discussion: These findings highlight the critical importance of realistic modeling of heterogeneous bone material properties and personalized, time-dependent coordinated muscle forces that serve as loading in subject-specific mandibular FE models. This proposed MMBS-FE model serves as a proof-of-concept framework and offers recommendations for biomechanical modeling of the human masticatory system under unilateral clenching conditions. By incorporating these recommendations, researchers can improve pre-clinical evaluation of craniomaxillofacial implants and surgical strategies.

Indexed as

boundary conditionsfinite element analysismandibular biomechanicsmaterial propertiesmuscle attachment areamusculoskeletal multibody simulationsubject-specific modelling

Identifiers

PMID42416534
PMCPMC13337648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.