Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416509›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia and translational medicine2026

Cocktail-style multifunctional resuscitation fluids: Where are we now in 2026?

Geoffrey L Liu, Lauren C Hollifield, Frank Chen, Henry Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Geoffrey L LiuPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Lauren C HollifieldPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Frank ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Henry LiuPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For over half a century, fluid resuscitation has traditionally included crystalloids for volume expansion and colloids for potential oncotic advantage. The paradigm, however, could be shifting now. The development of multifunctional resuscitation fluids is fast evolving. These fluids integrate multiple therapeutic components. Rather than serving as simple volume expanders, they function as advanced therapeutic platforms engineered to simultaneously target multiple pathological conditions. They correct hypovolemia, mitigate systemic inflammation and coagulopathy, improve organ perfusion and oxygen delivery, and support tissue recovery in conditions such as shock, endothelial dysfunction, and oxidative stress. This article reviews the basic concepts underpinning multifunctional resuscitation fluids and explores their potential clinical applications. It also assesses their advantages and limitations based on recent preclinical and early clinical trials, and outlines future directions necessary to translate these promising solutions from the bench to the bedside.

Indexed as

HemorrhageMultifunctional fluidsOxygen carrierResuscitationSepsisShock

Identifiers

PMID42416509
PMCPMC13338945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.