Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416477›Full record

ArticlePleura and peritoneum2026

PICCOS: study protocol for pressurised intraperitoneal aerosolised chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the management of cancers of the colon, ovary and stomach: a randomised controlled, phase II trial of efficacy in peritoneal metastases.

Sadie E F Jones, Elena Brogden, Jamie Murphy, Christopher J Peters, Jonathan Frost, Richard Adams, Sarah Gwynne, Emma Hudson, Kitrick Perry, Angela Casbard and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pleura and peritoneum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Sadie E F JonesCardiff and Vale University Health Board, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Elena BrogdenCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Jamie MurphyDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Christopher J PetersDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2081-5701
Jonathan FrostRoyal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
Richard AdamsCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Sarah GwynneSwansea Bay University Health Board, Southwest Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK.
Emma HudsonVelindre University NHS Trust, Velindre Cancer Hospital, Cardiff, UK.
Kitrick PerryImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Angela CasbardCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Rebecca HamiltonCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Lisette NixonCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Philip MarkhamCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Huda MohamedCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Gina BrownDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jane BlazebyNational Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Deborah FitzsimmonsSwansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Anuoluwa AjakaiyeCardiff and Vale University Health Board, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Leona M BattenCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Maureen EdgarCardiff and Vale University Health Board, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Amy CaseSwansea Bay University Health Board, Southwest Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK.
Peter KyleDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6150-6625
Sophie TateSwansea Bay University Health Board, Southwest Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK.
Karen ArndellCardiff and Vale University Health Board, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Daisy ElliottNational Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rhiannon MacefieldNational Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
David ChuterIndependent Cancer Patients Voice, London, UK.
Harry HallLondon, England.
Joy GarfittBrecon, Wales.
Jared TorkingtonCardiff and Vale University Health Board, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Peritoneal metastases (PM) represent a significant unmet need requiring urgent development of treatment options to improve patient prognosis and quality of life (QoL). A novel anti-cancer technology is Pressurised IntraPeritoneal Aerosolised Chemotherapy (PIPAC). PIPAC aims to improve target specificity of anti-cancer therapies by delivering medication as an aerosol directly to the peritoneum at laparoscopy. Early phase I/II studies suggest that PIPAC has the potential to improve treatment efficacy and cancer outcomes whilst maintaining or improving QoL through less systemic drug absorption. PICCOS aims to determine whether PIPAC can improve peritoneal progression free survival (pPFS) in patients with PM from, compared to SACT alone. Methods: PICCOS is a phase II, multi-centre, superiority, randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN 17575409). It aims to determine whether PIPAC (given alone or in combination with systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT)) can improve peritoneal progression free survival (pPFS) as per RECIST (V1.1) in patients with PM, compared to SACT alone. Key secondary outcome measures include quality of life, safety, overall survival and progression free survival. 216 patients with non-resectable PM from colorectal cancer, platinum resistant ovarian cancer and gastric cancer will be recruited. Patients will be randomised to receive either standard of care SACT alone or PIPAC in combination with (colorectal, gastric groups) or without (ovarian group) standard of care SACT. Median pPFS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test, stratified by prognostic factors, will be used to compare PFS distributions. Results: PIPAC is expected to achieve improved peritoneal progression free survival for patients in comparison to those treated with standard care. Conclusions: PICCOS aims to provide much needed, high-quality evidence on the efficacy of PIPAC in treating PM.

Indexed as

peritoneal metastasesPIPACquality of liferandomised controlled trialresponse evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST)

Identifiers

PMID42416477
PMCPMC13340826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.