ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Urolithiasis in donor kidneys presents a relative contraindication for transplantation due to the potential risk of obstruction and impaired graft function. Although less common in renal transplant recipients, obstructive urolithiasis remains a significant concern. Objective: To present a case series demonstrating the feasibility and outcomes of Methods: Three donor-recipient pairs underwent laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy via the retroperitoneal approach. The donor kidneys were preserved in ice slush, followed by Results: These three cases achieved complete stone removal with no intraoperative complications. The CITs were 54, 45, and 51 min, respectively. All grafts demonstrated immediate function postoperatively, evidenced by a marked decline in serum creatinine within 3 days. Imaging studies confirmed robust perfusion, and there were no signs of ureteral injury, obstruction, or residual stones. At 1-year follow-up, none of the recipients experienced recurrence of nephrolithiasis. Conclusion:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.