Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416389›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Multi-parameter prediction of extubation failure using spontaneous breathing trial and post-spontaneous breathing trial rest period data.

Hyun-Lim Yang, Seong-A Park, Sangha Kim, Ho-Geol Ryu, Hong Yeul Lee, Hannah Lee, Hyeonhoon Lee, Sang-Min Lee, Hyung-Chul Lee, Jinwoo Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hyun-Lim YangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2221-3042
Seong-A ParkDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0241-6746
Sangha KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ho-Geol RyuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hong Yeul LeeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hannah LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyeonhoon LeeHealthcare AI Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Sang-Min LeeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyung-Chul LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0048-7958
Jinwoo LeeDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0958-106X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: While extubation failure in critically ill patients is a significant challenge in intensive care units (ICUs), traditional predictors, such as the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), offer limited accuracy. This study aimed to develop a machine-learning model using data collected during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) and the rest period after SBT to improve the prediction of extubation failure. Methods: This retrospective and single-center cohort study analyzed data from 413 extubation cases involving 372 patients across both medical and surgical ICUs. Vital signs and ventilatory parameters were collected during the SBT and post-SBT rest period. A light gradient-boosting machine (LGBM) algorithm was employed, incorporating features derived from these vital signs. The model's performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: Among the included cases, 11.01% experienced extubation failure. The LGBM model, which integrated data from both SBT and post-SBT rest periods, along with RSBI, achieved the highest performance (AUROC: 0.789, AUPRC: 0.451). Key predictors included ICU duration, RSBI, and respiratory rate during SBT. Models utilizing only SBT or rest period data individually demonstrated significantly lower predictive power compared to those incorporating both time intervals (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Multi-parameter data from the SBT and post-SBT rest period provide dynamic insights into extubation readiness. The developed machine-learning model demonstrates modest improvement over traditional metrics such as RSBI and may serve as a complementary tool to support extubation decision-making.

Indexed as

critical careextubation failuremachine learningpredictive modelingspontaneous breathing trialvital signs

Identifiers

PMID42416389
PMCPMC13338533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.