ArticleInternational journal of mass spectrometry2025
Development of an optimised method for the analysis of human blood plasma samples by atmospheric solids analysis probe mass spectrometry.
Article in International journal of mass spectrometry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimising the choice of normalisation method for use in machine-learning classification of human blood plasma ambient ionisation mass spectra.International journal of mass spectrometry · 2026Article
- Prediction of clinical outcomes of ST-elevated myocardial infarction patients using atmospheric solids analysis probe mass spectrometry and machine learning.The Analyst · 2025Article
- Advancing atmospheric solids analysis probe mass spectrometry applications: a multifaceted approach to optimising clinical data set generation.The Analyst · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analysis of small-molecule metabolites in plasma has the potential for development as a clinical diagnostic and prognostic tool. Atmospheric solids analysis probe mass spectrometry (ASAP-MS) is capable of performing rapid metabolite and small molecule fingerprinting, and has the potential for use in a clinical setting. Combining ASAP-MS data with a predictive model could provide clinicians with a rapid patient risk metric, anticipating disease progression and response to treatment, and thereby aiding in treatment decisions. In order to develop predictive models, experimental errors and uncertainties must be minimised, requiring a robust experimental protocol. In the present study we have performed ASAP-MS measurements on plasma samples from patients recruited for two prospective clinical studies: the Oxford Acute Myocardial Infarction (OxAMI) study; and the Oxford Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (OxAAA) study. Through a carefully designed series of measurements, we have optimised the method of sample introduction, together with a number of key instrument and data acquisition parameters. Following the optimisation process, we are consistently able to record high quality mass spectra for plasma samples. Typical coefficients of variation for individual mass peaks are in the range from 20%-50%, overlapping with those obtained using more sophisticated LC-MS approaches. The measurement protocol optimises mass spectral quality and reproducibility, while retaining the simplicity of measurement required for use in a clinical setting. While the protocol was developed using plasma samples from two specific patient cohorts, the method can be generalised to any plasma measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.