Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416274›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026

How mNGS transforms care for non-verbal elderly stroke patients with pneumonia.

Yuhai Dang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yuhai DangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Guangxi Jiangbin Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) is a severe complication in non-verbal elderly stroke patients, with diagnosis hindered by the low sensitivity and slow turnaround of conventional microbial culture. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on 64 non-verbal elderly SAP patients (≥65 years) admitted to Guangxi Jiangbin Hospital from 2018 to 2022, divided into an mNGS group (n=30, sputum/BALF tested by metagenomic next-generation sequencing) and a control group (n=34, conventional culture). Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance baseline characteristics, and clinical outcomes and pathogen detection efficiency were compared between groups. Multivariable Cox regression adjusted for hypoalbuminemia, electrolyte disturbance and stroke severity. Results: mNGS detected more bacterial pathogens (37 vs.27 in sputum, 37 vs.21 in BALF) and identified 3 viral and 2 atypical pathogens undetectable by culture, with a negative rate of 13.3% (vs.20.0% for sputum culture, 43.3% for BALF culture). 73.3% of mNGS group patients received antimicrobial therapy adjustment. After adjustment, the mNGS group had notably higher 28-day (96.7% vs.76.5%; adjusted HR = 0.32, Conclusion: mNGS enables more comprehensive pathogen detection in non-verbal elderly SAP patients, guides targeted antimicrobial therapy, and is associated with improved survival and reduced healthcare resource consumption. However, large-sample multicenter prospective studies are needed to validate these findings due to the study's limitations.

Indexed as

PneumoniaStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMetagenomicsRetrospective StudiesSputumAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial stewardshipelderlymetagenomic next-generation sequencingmortalitynon-verbalpathogen detectionstroke-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID42416274
PMCPMC13337894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.