ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Case Report: Stepwise quantitative assessment of intraoperative intracranial pressure after perforation, craniotomy, dural incision, and hematoma removal in acute subdural hematoma.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Severe traumatic brain injury often requires emergency surgical intervention such as craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy. The timely reduction of intracranial pressure (ICP) is critical for improving neurological outcomes. However, limited quantitative data exist regarding how each surgical step of perforation, craniotomy, dural incision, and hematoma removal contributes to ICP reduction in acute subdural hematoma. Case presentation: A man in his 40s developed bilateral acute subdural hematomas (right/left: 8/7 mm thick) following a fall. His initial Glasgow Coma Scale score was 3. Because the bilateral hematomas were relatively thin, we initially opted for medical management, inserting an ICP sensor into the right frontal lobe for continuous monitoring. Despite initial neurocritical care, ICP remained elevated (45 mmHg). Serial imaging revealed the progression of cerebral edema and midline shift. Emergent decompressive craniectomy on the left side was therefore performed under continuous ICP monitoring. ICP was recorded at each surgical step: single burr hole placement (42 mmHg), partial craniotomy (39 mmHg), complete craniotomy (20 mmHg), dural incision (14 mmHg), and hematoma evacuation (9 mmHg). Each step produced a measurable decrease in ICP. Despite aggressive management, the patient's condition deteriorated; he died on hospital day 21. Conclusion: The present case illustrates the stepwise contribution of each surgical intervention to ICP reduction in acute subdural hematoma. Although the clinical outcome was unfavorable, these quantitative data provide valuable insights into the decompressive effect of each surgical step. These findings underscore the importance of prompt and progressive surgical management of severe traumatic brain injury with elevated ICP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.