ReviewFrontiers in surgery2026
Analysis of the learning curve for neuroendoscopic evacuation of basal ganglia hemorrhage.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neuroendoscopic evacuation has become an important minimally invasive approach for the treatment of basal ganglia hemorrhage. However, its technical complexity requires a well-defined learning curve, and evidence regarding learning curve characteristics, particularly among experienced surgeons, remains limited. Objective: To evaluate the learning curve of neuroendoscopic evacuation for basal ganglia hemorrhage and to determine the number of cases required to achieve technical proficiency. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 120 consecutive patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage who underwent neuroendoscopic evacuation performed by a single experienced neurosurgeon. The learning curve was assessed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis based on operative time. A segmented regression model and a power-law model were applied to characterize the learning curve. Surgical outcomes, hemostasis strategies, and postoperative imaging indicators were compared across different learning phases. Results: The CUSUM analysis identified a clear learning inflection point at approximately the 25th case. Operative time decreased significantly across phases (1.77 ± 0.47 h vs. 1.28 ± 0.40 h vs. 1.23 ± 0.42 h, Conclusion: Significant differences exist in neuroendoscopic evacuation of basal ganglia hematomas across different learning phases. These findings can provide guiding value for clinicians to improve surgical efficiency and quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.