ReviewEcancermedicalscience2026
Community-based peer education as a tool for the prevention of breast cancer: a narrative review.
Review in Ecancermedicalscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer remains a major threat to women, especially in low-resource settings like Nigeria, where awareness and screening are limited. Peer education may offer a practical way to improve early detection and prevention in these communities. Objective: To examine how peer education supports breast cancer prevention in communities by exploring its delivery methods, impact on knowledge and behaviour and the cultural and practical factors that shape its effectiveness. Methods: A narrative review was conducted to explore the role of community-based peer education in breast cancer prevention. Relevant studies published between 2010 and 2025 were identified through a systematic search of six databases (CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Medline and APA PsycINFO) using specific keywords. After screening and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, data were extracted from selected studies and thematically analysed to identify patterns, benefits and challenges of peer education interventions. Result: Out of 818 studies initially retrieved, only 18 met the eligibility criteria and were reviewed, covering diverse locations and participant groups, mostly from high-income countries. The studies showed that peer education delivered through various methods and tailored to cultural contexts significantly improved breast cancer awareness, screening behaviours and community engagement, though challenges like role confusion, cultural barriers and logistical issues were also reported. Conclusion: This review concludes that peer education is an effective, adaptable strategy for promoting breast cancer prevention in community settings, especially among underserved populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.