ArticleEcancermedicalscience2026
Perspectives and preferences on palliative chemotherapy-immunotherapy in gallbladder cancer patients.
Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients' perspective and preferences about the chemotherapy are not known. This study investigates the perspectives and treatment preferences of Indian gallbladder (GBC) patients. Methods: A prospective 18-month study at a tertiary cancer center in Mumbai enrolled patients with histologically confirmed GBC receiving palliative chemotherapy, who were counselled in a structured format regarding disease, treatment options, outcomes and drug costs. Data were collected through structured interviews using quality-of-life and decision-making questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse patient responses. A pilot sample of 30 patients was used to assess whether ≥90% prioritise survival as the primary expectation from chemo-immunotherapy. Using an exact one-sided binomial design, ≤23 responses favouring survival would indicate the proportion is <90% and warrant further study. We also evaluated the psychological distress among these patients. Results: Among 30 participants (56.67% female), 83.33% were of advanced stage. Baseline demographics is depicted. Treatment priorities varied: 40% preferred life prolongation, 23.33% favoured symptom relief and 36.67% valued both equally. Financial burden strongly influenced decisions about immunotherapy, only 6.67% were willing to pay ₹35 lakhs out-of-pocket for a 1.5-month gain, while 100% would take treatment if it were government-funded. Emotional distress was significant, with a mean NCCN score of 6.21 ± 1.80. Major concerns included financial strain (42%), fear (45%) and depression (33%). Conclusion: Twenty-three percent of patients favoured only symptom relief as a treatment when they were educated about the outcomes. A larger study is warranted to further consolidate our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.