ArticleEcancermedicalscience2026
A high-resolution geospatial analysis of radiation therapy access in the Philippines.
Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In 2019, the Philippines enacted the National Integrated Cancer Control Act (NICCA) to decentralise cancer care. However, implementation remains limited by a lack of data to guide effective resource allocation. This study provides high-resolution, quantitative baseline data of radiotherapy (RT) accessibility in Luzon, the country's largest island group, to identify priority areas for infrastructure development. Methods: A cross-sectional geospatial analysis for 698 municipalities was conducted using the Enhanced Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (E2SFCA) model, integrating provider capacity, population demand and calibrated travel time. Access was modelled under two scenarios: one including all 43 RT facilities and another restricted to the 12 public centres. To quantify financial toxicity, we developed a novel metric, the travel-cost-to-wage ratio. We performed spatial autocorrelation and multivariable regression analyses to identify geographic clusters and key determinants of access. Results: Profound inequities in RT access were identified. Considering all facilities, 240 municipalities (34.4%) home to 7.5 million people, had no potential access within a 120-minute catchment. The public-only scenario revealed a near-total system inadequacy, with 12.2 million people lacking access. Spatial analysis confirmed a stark core-periphery pattern, with a well-served core centred around the national capital and along the primary north-south expressway network, contrasted with vast, statistically significant 'RT deserts' in outlying regions. For 4.9 million people, a single round-trip to the nearest public facility costs more than a day's minimum wage; this travel-cost-to-wage ratio was the strongest predictor of access (odds ratio = 0.83, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Spatial access to RT in Luzon is profoundly inequitable, characterised by a stark core-periphery pattern and an inadequate public system that leaves millions reliant on private care or entirely without access. This study provides a data-driven roadmap to guide the strategic implementation of NICCA, ensuring that future resource allocation targets the identified RT deserts to address these critical gaps in cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.