Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416202›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces2026

Rapid Exploration of Mixture Adsorption via Adiabatic Sampling.

Caroline Desgranges, Jerome Delhommelle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline DesgrangesDepartment of Physics Applied Physics, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4171-5750
Jerome DelhommelleDepartment of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6498-6927

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficient computational screening of large libraries of porous materials for gas storage applications relies on the ability of simulations to rapidly predict the phase diagrams of confined fluids, their adsorption properties, and the selectivity of adsorbents in separation applications. While isothermal grand-canonical simulations are commonly used to this end, their convergence rate can dramatically decrease when the thermodynamic conditions approach coexistence, giving rise to metastability and the onset of large free-energy barriers. To address this challenge, we develop an adiabatic counterpart for the simulation of mixtures, derive the acceptance rules for a grand-isochoric adiabatic Monte Carlo method, and assess its accuracy and efficiency through comparisons with isothermal grand-canonical simulations of Ar-Kr mixtures, both in the bulk and when adsorbed in an MCM-41 porous material. The results show that adiabatic simulations allow for large temperature variations, thereby resulting in the rapid sampling of the configuration space and faster convergence than the grand-canonical simulations by up to 2 orders of magnitude.

Identifiers

PMID42416202
PMCPMC13339766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.