Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416194›Full record

ReviewAlpha psychiatry2026

EEG Neurofeedback for Major Depressive Disorder: A Scoping Review.

Dan Cătălin Oprea, Jonathan Rabinowitz, Bogdan Gireadă, Bogdan-Ionel Tamba, Romeo-Petru Dobrin, Eliza-Mihaela Cămănaru, Vlad Teodor Iacob, Ana Caterina Cristofor, Alexandra Boloș, Roxana Chiriță

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alpha psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dan Cătălin OpreaGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Iasi, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3885-782X
Jonathan RabinowitzGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Iasi, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6845-8064
Bogdan GireadăGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Iasi, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6657-5685
Bogdan-Ionel TambaGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Iasi, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-1999
Romeo-Petru DobrinGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Iasi, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3023-0205
Eliza-Mihaela CămănaruGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Iasi, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0699-0483
Vlad Teodor IacobGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Iasi, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1790-8384
Ana Caterina CristoforGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Iasi, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7110-3677
Alexandra BoloșGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Iasi, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1247-0383
Roxana ChirițăGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Iasi, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0614-3778

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurofeedback (NF) is an emerging treatment for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). NF is a training approach that enables individuals to self-regulate brain activity patterns associated with emotional and cognitive dysfunction. While interest is increasing, research results vary, and clinical implementation does not follow standardized protocols. This scoping review aimed to map and synthesize the existing peer-reviewed evidence on electroencephalography (EEG)-based neurofeedback interventions for MDD, with a focus on training protocols, neurophysiological targets, reported clinical outcomes, and methodological limitations. A systematic scoping review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines (OSF registration): https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NQ3BW. Electronic searches were performed across Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies were included if they evaluated EEG-based neurofeedback interventions in adults with MDD and reported clinical or neurophysiological outcomes. Of 1299 records identified, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing outcome data from 175 patients who received active EEG-NF. The studies observed a reduction in depressive symptoms following neurofeedback, most commonly using frontal alpha asymmetry protocols (k = 5). Potential improvements in cognitive performance were reported in 4 studies, particularly those incorporating upper-alpha or beta/theta modulation. Connectivity-based approaches using low-resolution electromagnetic tomography Z-score neurofeedback (low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA); k = 2) suggested possible effects on deep brain networks involved in emotional regulation, though replication remains limited. This scoping review outlines the existing evidence on EEG-based neurofeedback in major depressive disorder, highlighting the diversity of protocols, targets, and reported outcomes. While preliminary findings suggest potential clinical relevance, substantial methodological limitations and heterogeneity remain. These observations emphasize the need for more rigorous, standardized, and longitudinal research to better define the role of EEG-based neurofeedback in the treatment of MDD.

Indexed as

biofeedbackdepressive disorderelectroencephalographyendogenous depressionsmajor depressive disorderneurofeedback

Identifiers

PMID42416194
PMCPMC13339797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.