SynthesisAlpha psychiatry2026
Association Between Expressed Emotion and Relapse of Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Alpha psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Expressed emotion (EE) is a robust predictor of relapse in individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. However, the evidence on this relationship has not been fully examined in individuals with bipolar disorder (BD). This systematic review was conducted to provide updated evidence on the association between EE and relapse in BD. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in seven databases and two registries from inception to 29 December 2025. The Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) critical appraisal checklists were used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The review process was conducted independently by two reviewers, with consensus for each step achieved through consultation with a third reviewer. A narrative synthesis was performed to categorise the findings, with particular focus on the impact of global EE and its subdomains on relapse in BD. Results: Of the 2963 records identified, seven studies were included in this review. The majority of studies were rated as having a low risk of bias. The narrative synthesis indicates that high EE is significantly associated with an increased risk of relapse in BD, particularly for depressive episodes, and is linked to critical comments and emotional over-involvement, two key subdomains of EE. Conclusions: This review provides evidence of a potential association between high EE, its subdomains, and relapse in BD. These preliminary findings contribute to the development of family-based interventions for BD and highlight the need for larger-scale, longitudinal prospective cohort studies to further clarify this relationship. Registration: The study has been registered on https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ (registration number: CRD42025632303; registration link: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025632303).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.