ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
A fair lexical decision task for monolingual and multilingual Spanish-speakers.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study describes the development and validation of ROAR Palabra, a novel Spanish lexical decision task designed for use with both Spanish-speaking children and Spanish-English bilinguals. This self-administered task requires students to decide whether a string of letters presented on the screen is a real word in Spanish. While there is evidence that scores on English lexical decision tasks are highly predictive of performance on conventional (time- and resource-intensive) word reading assessments in English, we explore whether this holds in Spanish, which has a much more transparent orthography. The specific goals are (i) to create a linguistically fair task using item-response theory and (ii) to evaluate whether such task can serve as a reliable proxy for conventional word reading measures, offering a quick and easy-to-administer tool for assessing reading skills across linguistic and cultural contexts. Results demonstrated strong correlations between performance on ROAR Palabra and standardized word reading assessments such as the Woodcock-Muñoz Batería IV, suggesting its effectiveness as a substitute measure. Notably, the task was sensitive to differences in language proficiency across both monolingual and multilingual groups, reflecting expected developmental and environmental influences. While not specifically designed for the comparisons between monolingual and multilingual populations, the findings underscore the potential of this task as a versatile and culturally adaptable tool for reading assessments in different Spanish-speaking and bilingual contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.