ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Music, imagery, and infertility: a qualitative inquiry into symptoms, treatments, and expressive therapies with infertility clinicians.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Infertility is a growing global issue that causes significant mental health distress. Individuals with infertility can experience stress, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Infertility counseling is a growing field, and the introduction of expressive arts therapies has allowed for a more in-depth understanding of the client's infertility experience. Currently there is no research on the use of music and imagery with the infertility population, and very little research into the use of expressive arts with the same population. The aim of this study was to engage infertility clinicians through interview to explore current symptoms and treatments in the infertility community, and to explore how music and imagery as an arts-based method shaped clinician reflection. Methods: This qualitative phenomenological study used arts-based research methods to introduce the use of music and imagery with the infertility population, starting with clinicians currently working in the infertility field. Purposive sampling was used to recruit five infertility clinicians, four women and one man. Data were collected via a Zoom consisting of an artistic music and imagery experience and interviews. Using thematic Results: A total of five themes were identified, with subthemes- (1) The Complicated and Widespread Experience of Loss (emotional loss, loss of confidence, loss of fertility education, loss of genetic children because of my body, loss of social comfort, complicated structures of loss, colors/imagery representing loss), (2) Inconsistent Support Around the Infertility Experience (individual vs. couple/group, male vs. female, third party, clinical/medical, financial, isolating imagery), (3) The Long-term Mental Health Impact of Infertility (mental health, family), (4) The Long-term Mental Health Impact of Infertility (mental health, family, resolution in imagery), and (5) Reflection of Client Experience (facilitation of reflection through music, possible uses with clients). Discussion: Findings from this study demonstrated the potential of music and imagery as a positive tool for infertility mental health. Symptoms reported by clinicians corroborate past research on the impact of infertility on mental health, and participants identified a sense of loss in all areas of life. Participants discussed the music and imagery experience, with all noting the potential positives for use with clients. Limitations to this study and recommendations for future research were identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.