ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
An examination of perceived partner phubbing in romantic relationships across various variables.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Partner phubbing, defined as ignoring one's romantic partner by attending to a mobile phone during face-to-face interactions, has become an increasingly important issue in romantic relationships. This study examined perceived partner phubbing across gender, marital status, age, and relationship duration. Methods: A correlational survey design was employed with 446 adults currently involved in a romantic relationship. Data were collected using the Partner Phubbing Scale. Independent samples t-tests, one-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs), and multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to examine differences and predictors of perceived partner phubbing. Results: Women reported significantly higher levels of perceived partner phubbing than men, and married individuals scored higher than single individuals. Analyses with respect to age indicated that young adults reported lower levels of perceived partner phubbing than older age groups, with perceptions increasing with age. Perceived partner phubbing also differed according to relationship duration, with individuals in relationships lasting 5-10 years reporting the highest levels. Multiple regression analyses revealed that gender and being in a relationship for 5-10 years were significant predictors of perceived partner phubbing. Discussion: The findings suggest that demographic and relational characteristics play an important role in shaping perceptions of partner phubbing. These results contribute to the growing literature on technology-related behaviors in romantic relationships and have important implications for couple therapy and digital wellbeing interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.