Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416146›Full record

ArticlePaediatric & neonatal pain2026

Swedish Nurses Pain Assessment Documentation of Children in the Perioperative Period.

Emma Westin, Angelica Wiljén, Johanna Hagman, Stefan Nilsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric & neonatal pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma WestinDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences Linnaeus University Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Växjö Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6284-5859
Angelica WiljénInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Johanna HagmanDepartment of Paediatrics Region Västra Götaland, Skaraborg Hospital Skövde Skövde Sweden.
Stefan NilssonInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8847-9559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In healthcare, pain is common in children, with a higher risk of pain in children admitted for surgery. According to guidelines, pain should be assessed with a pain scale suitable to the age and maturity of the child to be able to provide the right treatment. However, research indicates shortages in assessment and documentation regarding children's pain. The aim of the current study was to describe the frequency and nature of pain assessment documentation, including pain intensity scoring, in surgical patients across the perioperative period. We performed a quantitative descriptive retrospective review of medical records at two county hospitals in the south of Sweden. In all, 114 children 7-17 years of age admitted to one of the hospitals in connection to surgery were included. Demographic and clinical data such as age, sex, type of surgery, and documentation regarding pain were collected from the medical records according to a predetermined protocol including the number and type of pain assessments and pain intensity scores. Data were analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics. The findings show that pain scales were used and documented in 89 children (78.8%) once or more during the stay, and 155 (63.8%) of these assessments were performed in the recovery unit. One or more pain narratives were found in 113 (99.1%) of the medical records, of which 350 (69.6%) were written postoperative on the pediatric ward. There was a significant difference in the number of children who had at least one documented pain scale assessment, both between the hospitals and between the different time periods within the hospitals (preoperative on ward, recovery unit and postoperative on ward), but not between age groups. Moderate to severe pain was reported in 38.6% of the pain scale ratings. In conclusion, all the children had some kind of documented assessment of pain during their hospital stay, but not all children had a documented pain scale assessment. Documented pain scale assessments were most common in the recovery unit, whereas pain narratives were most common on the pediatric ward after the surgery. Looking at the entire length of the hospital stay, the result indicates that national guidelines for pain assessment are not being followed.

Indexed as

childrenpain assessmentpain prevalencesurgery

Identifiers

PMID42416146
PMCPMC13339923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.