ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
Rate of Shoulder Arthroplasty After Anterior Shoulder Instability Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recurrent or persistent anterior shoulder instability (ASI), the most common form of shoulder instability, may progress over time to osteoarthritis (OA) necessitating shoulder arthroplasty. Anterior shoulder instability surgery (ASIS) techniques, including soft-tissue and bony augmentation procedures, have been shown to reduce the risk of recurrent dislocation. Purpose: The purpose of this review is to evaluate the rates of progression to shoulder arthroplasty, time to conversion to shoulder arthroplasty, OA grades at time of conversion, and clinical outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in patients with a history of ASI initially managed with ASIS, including glenoid labrum repair, Bankart repair, or coracoid transfer procedures. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using combinations of keywords related to shoulder arthroplasty and ASIS. The search was performed on February 26, 2026, across the PubMed, Ovid, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Outcomes analyzed included the rate of shoulder arthroplasty after ASIS, time to conversion to shoulder arthroplasty, age at each procedure, OA grade at the time of conversion, range of motion, infection rate, revision rate, failure rate, and clinical outcome scores. Results: A total of 52 studies met preliminary inclusion criteria, and 19 studies met full inclusion criteria. Current studies suggest that the conversion rate from ASIS to shoulder arthroplasty is 1.25% and that shoulder arthroplasty was performed, on average, 25.3 years after initial ASIS. ASIS was performed at a mean age of 29 years, while shoulder arthroplasty was performed at a mean age of 61 years. Also, 55% of patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty after ASIS had Walch grade A1 lesions. Conclusion: ASIS was associated with a low long-term conversion rate to shoulder arthroplasty, occurring at a mean of 2.5 decades postoperatively. These findings suggest that ASIS provides durable joint preservation with conversion to shoulder arthroplasty remaining rare over long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.