ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2026
Teleophthalmology for triage and management of corneal pathologies at vision centres: a prospective observational service evaluation study in north India.
Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the feasibility of teleophthalmology for triage and management of corneal diseases at vision centres (VCs) in rural and semi-urban North India. Methods: All patients presenting to the VCs with corneal pathology who underwent teleconsultation for corneal disease during the study period (March-September 2024) were included in the study. Those who reported before or after the study period were not included. After registration and preliminary examination at the VC, unstained and stained images of patients with corneal pathologies were sent to an in-training cornea fellow at the tertiary centre via a web-based application. Management at the VC was carried out by vision technicians under specialist supervision; acute cases received preliminary emergency care and were referred to a secondary care hospital. Non-acute pathologies were managed at the primary level or referred as needed. Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients managed at VCs versus those referred, and compliance with referrals. Secondary outcomes were factors influencing referral compliance and reporting timelines for emergency and non-emergency cases. Results: Of 4, 825 patients with corneal disease, 2, 022 (41.91%) were managed at VCs, while 2, 803 (58.09%) were referred. Hot (acute/emergency) corneal cases comprised 1, 852; cold (non-acute/non-emergency) cases comprised 2, 973. Overall referral compliance was 27.58% (772/2, 803 referred cases). Regression analysis identified significant predictors of referral uptake, including proximity to hospitals and longer-established centres (p<0.001 for most associations). Acute cases and those from centres more than one year old were more likely to reach the hospital after referral. Conclusions: Teleconsultation provided by specialist ophthalmologists enabled local triage and management of corneal diseases at the primary level, reduced unnecessary referrals, and helped counsel patients in emergency conditions. This model can be adopted by other ocular specialities and strengthen primary care in resource-constrained areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.