SynthesisNeurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)2026
Efficacy and Safety of Plasma Exchange and Immunoadsorption for Acute Optic Neuritis in Patients with Demyelinating Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Optic neuritis (ON), a common manifestation of demyelinating disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), often leads to significant visual impairment. Although high-dose corticosteroids are a first-line therapy, many patients experience incomplete recovery. Apheresis therapies, including plasma exchange (PLEX) and immunoadsorption (IA), are being increasingly used as rescue treatments, but their efficacy and safety are debated. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating PLEX and IA for acute ON in patients with demyelinating diseases. Four databases were searched up to January 2025. The included studies reported visual or neurological outcomes in patients with MS, NMOSD, MOGAD, or idiopathic ON. The primary outcomes were treatment response and visual acuity changes (logMAR). The study quality was assessed using RoB 2, ROBINS-I, or JBI tools. Random effects models were employed for the meta-analysis. Results: Twelve studies (800+ ON attacks) were analyzed. Both PLEX and IA demonstrated significant visual improvement, with a pooled mean logMAR reduction of -1.11 (95% CI: -1.70 to -0.53). Early intervention correlated with better outcomes. MOGAD-ON patients showed the highest response rates, while delayed treatment in NMOSD-ON patients was linked to poorer vision. Adverse events were rare and mild. Conclusion: PLEX and IA are effective and safe second-line therapies for steroid-refractory ON, particularly when initiated early. These findings support the prompt use of apheresis in eligible patients to optimize visual recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.