Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42415978›Full record

SynthesisNeurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)2026

Efficacy and Safety of Plasma Exchange and Immunoadsorption for Acute Optic Neuritis in Patients with Demyelinating Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mehenaz A Hanbazazh, Mohammed Ridha Algethami, Abdulwahhab Omar AnbarSerry, Ruba Mohammed Alghanmi, Lama Nawaf Alanazi, Ahmed Ayed N Alanazi, Bashaier Gubran AlQahtani, Mohammed Abdullah Alamri

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mehenaz A HanbazazhDivision of Pathology, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8425-7003
Mohammed Ridha AlgethamiDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulwahhab Omar AnbarSerryCollage of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ruba Mohammed AlghanmiCollege of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Lama Nawaf AlanaziCollage of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Ayed N AlanaziCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
Bashaier Gubran AlQahtaniPrince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Abdullah AlamriCollage of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Optic neuritis (ON), a common manifestation of demyelinating disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), often leads to significant visual impairment. Although high-dose corticosteroids are a first-line therapy, many patients experience incomplete recovery. Apheresis therapies, including plasma exchange (PLEX) and immunoadsorption (IA), are being increasingly used as rescue treatments, but their efficacy and safety are debated. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating PLEX and IA for acute ON in patients with demyelinating diseases. Four databases were searched up to January 2025. The included studies reported visual or neurological outcomes in patients with MS, NMOSD, MOGAD, or idiopathic ON. The primary outcomes were treatment response and visual acuity changes (logMAR). The study quality was assessed using RoB 2, ROBINS-I, or JBI tools. Random effects models were employed for the meta-analysis. Results: Twelve studies (800+ ON attacks) were analyzed. Both PLEX and IA demonstrated significant visual improvement, with a pooled mean logMAR reduction of -1.11 (95% CI: -1.70 to -0.53). Early intervention correlated with better outcomes. MOGAD-ON patients showed the highest response rates, while delayed treatment in NMOSD-ON patients was linked to poorer vision. Adverse events were rare and mild. Conclusion: PLEX and IA are effective and safe second-line therapies for steroid-refractory ON, particularly when initiated early. These findings support the prompt use of apheresis in eligible patients to optimize visual recovery.

Indexed as

Demyelinating DiseasesImmunosorbent TechniquesOptic NeuritisPlasma ExchangeHumansMyelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated DiseaseTreatment OutcomeDemyelinating diseasesImmunoadsorptionOptic neuritisPlasma exchangeVisual recovery

Identifiers

PMID42415978
PMCPMC13340604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.