ArticleNeurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)2026
Patient Activation Measures Among Individuals With Epilepsy: A Cross-Sectional Study of an Arabic-Speaking Population.
Article in Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To examine patient activation levels among Arabic-speaking adults with epilepsy and to explore their associations with selected clinical and sociodemographic variables. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 109 adult patients with confirmed epilepsy between December 2023 and October 2025. Data were collected during outpatient clinic visits, with additional information obtained through telephone contact when necessary. A sample size estimate indicated that at least 96 participants were required to achieve 80% statistical power. Patient activation was assessed using the validated Arabic version of the 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13). The variables examined included seizure type, medication regimen (monotherapy versus polytherapy), employment status, and medication adherence. Self-reported adherence was categorized as high or low based on patient responses regarding medication-taking behavior. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 27. PAM scores were compared across relevant groups using appropriate bivariate statistical tests, and a Results: The mean PAM score was 66.2 ± 17.6, corresponding to a moderate level of activation. Most participants (86.2%) demonstrated activation levels of 3 or 4. Focal epilepsy was more common (62.4%) than generalized epilepsy was (37.6%). Monotherapy was used by 51.4% of the participants, and 77.1% reported high medication adherence. Compared with unemployed or retired participants, employed individuals had significantly higher PAM scores (72.0 vs. 60.0, Conclusion: Most patients demonstrated moderate to high activation levels. Employment status and medication adherence were positively associated with activation, suggesting potential targets for interventions aimed at improving self-management among individuals with epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.