SynthesisFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
ACL reconstruction postoperative rehabilitation in China: a bibliometrics study and visualization analysis via CiteSpace.
Synthesis in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the research status, hotspots, and trends in the field of postoperative rehabilitation treatment for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in China from 2005 to 2025, so as to provide reference for research in this field. Methods: Taking CNKI and Wanfang databases as data sources, the search terms included "anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction" combined with related terms such as "rehabilitation treatment" and "rehabilitation training". A total of 1,052 Chinese literatures published from January 2005 to July 2025 were screened. CiteSpace 6.3.R1 software was used for visual analysis of the trend of publication volume, author and institution cooperation networks, and keywords. Results: The annual number of publications in this field in China showed a fluctuating increasing trend, reaching a peak of 119 in 2024; the density of the author cooperation network was only 0.005, and Ma Yubao was the core author (8 publications); the institution cooperation network was loose, with Sichuan Orthopedic Hospital and other institutions as the main research units; keyword clustering formed 9 core fields including functional training and proprioception, and the research hotspots experienced three stages of evolution: basic rehabilitation (2013-2016), technology integration (2020-2022), and precision rehabilitation (2022-2023). Conclusions: The research on rehabilitation treatment after ACL reconstruction in China is developing well, but there is insufficient cross-institutional and cross-regional cooperation. In the future, it is necessary to strengthen multi-center collaboration and focus on the research and development of intelligent rehabilitation and precision training technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.