ArticleOptics continuum2026
Size estimation of mixed free-floating sub-resolution spherical scatterers utilizing adaptive scanning optical coherence tomography.
Article in Optics continuum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a volumetric imaging technique that enables real-time assessment of biological tissues with micrometer-scale resolution. This enables OCT to also offer the potential to estimate scatterer size. However, in cases where the axial and lateral resolution of the OCT system are larger than the target scatterer, it is difficult to assess the scatterer size directly within the OCT space domain. This paper presents a workflow to estimate diameters of individual free-floating spherical particles within OCT volumes, leveraging adaptive scanning, spectroscopic OCT, and Mie theory. Using this workflow, we demonstrate the capability to estimate individual microbead diameters ranging from 6 to 10 μm, both in isolation and within mixed solutions with 12 × speed up than the previous method. The results indicate that the proposed Mie backscattering approach yields size estimations that were statistically equivalent to labeled values. In experiments with a mixed solution containing microbeads of 6 μm, 8 μm, and 10 μm diameters, our method successfully differentiated the three bead sizes through histogram analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.