Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42415921›Full record

ArticleAdvances in urology2026

Optimal Timing for Ureteral Stent Removal After Ureteroscopy to Minimize Morbidity: A Single-Center Prospective Comparative Study.

Muhammad Abdullah Rahman Shwani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Muhammad Abdullah Rahman ShwaniKurdistan Higher Council of Medical Specialties, Erbil Teaching Hospital, Erbil, Kurdistan, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5666-0938

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare patient-reported morbidity across three ureteral stent removal protocols after ureteroscopy (URS) and holmium laser lithotripsy. Patients and Methods: We prospectively recruited 180 patients undergoing URS for unilateral ureteric or renal stones (1-1.5 cm) from January 2021 to December 2024 at a single academic center. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon using a semirigid or flexible ureteroscope, holmium laser lithotripsy, and placement of a 6Fr × 26 cm double-J stent. Patients were sequentially allocated into three groups based on stent removal timing: Group A (24-48 h, Results: Baseline characteristics were similar across groups. Group A had the lowest USSQ total score (68.4 ± 12.6 vs. 76.8 ± 13.4 in Group B vs. 89.7 ± 15.2 in Group C; Conclusion: In this prospective comparative study, stent removal at 24-48 h was associated with lower morbidity, earlier return to activities, and higher patient satisfaction compared to later removal, without an observed increase in complications. These findings suggest that early removal may be beneficial in appropriately selected patients without contraindications. Removal at 3-5 days may represent a practical alternative when earlier removal is not feasible. Adequately powered randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

holmium laser lithotripsypatient-reported outcomesquality of lifestent removal timingureteral stentureteroscopyUSSQ

Identifiers

PMID42415921
PMCPMC13338889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.